Accuracy of bone mapping and guided flapless implant placement in human cadavers using a model-based planning procedure.
AffiliationDivision of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dublin Dental School and Hospital, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Patient Care Planning
MetadataShow full item record
CitationAccuracy of bone mapping and guided flapless implant placement in human cadavers using a model-based planning procedure., 25 (5):999-1006 Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
JournalThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
AbstractThe objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of the model-based NobelGuide method in transferring preoperative planning and estimation of bone volume to the surgical situation.
Thirteen implant replicas were placed in bounded edentulous spaces in nine human cadavers. Highly restrictive guides were fabricated using preoperative bone mapping data. A stone cast was modified to represent the bone contours at the implant site. Postoperative impressions were taken for comparison with the planning cast that had been used to generate the guides. Mucoperiosteal flaps were raised over each implant site, and the areas were inspected for fenestrations, thread exposures, or dehiscences. A coordinate measuring device was used to obtain positional and angular information from each implant placed in the planned and postsurgical casts. These were compared and analyzed for clinical and statistical significance.
The median value for linear accuracy in three dimensions for the model-based NobelGuide was 0.48 mm and the median angular deviation was 2.88 degrees. The greatest measured errors were still within clinically acceptable limits. The bone mapping was of sufficient diagnostic value for implant placement in sites with sufficient bone volume (greater than 5 mm buccolingually). In sites with insufficient bone volume, dehiscences were seen, but the accuracy was independent of bone volume.
The use of the model-based NobelGuide encourages adherence to the restorative-driven approach. The accuracy of the method is within acceptable limits for guided surgery described in the literature, and the use of the bone mapping is satisfactory in cases with adequate bone volume. The technique can also be used in sites with insufficient bone volume, but a mucoperiosteal flap procedure is recommended. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:999-1006.
- Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
- Authors: Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, Cannas B, Fäldt J, Söderberg R, Näsström K
- Issue date: 2010 Jun
- Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
- Authors: Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R
- Issue date: 2009 Sep
- Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
- Authors: Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W
- Issue date: 2010 Aug
- Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
- Authors: Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF
- Issue date: 2009 Feb
- Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
- Authors: Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A
- Issue date: 2009 Mar-Apr