Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTreacy, A
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, J
dc.contributor.authorKay, E W
dc.contributor.authorLeader, M
dc.contributor.authorGrace, A
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-07T09:07:37Z
dc.date.available2011-04-07T09:07:37Z
dc.date.issued2009-04
dc.identifier.citationHas the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy? 2009, 37 (4):239-40 Diagn. Cytopathol.en
dc.identifier.issn1097-0339
dc.identifier.pmid19217033
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dc.20993
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/127649
dc.description.abstractLiquid-based cytology (LBC) has replaced conventional smear assessment in many centers over recent years. In our laboratory this transfer took place in 1999. At that time we performed a split sample study comparing the conventional method of cervical smear evaluation with the ThinPrep system. This split sample study identified a dramatic improvement in specimen adequacy with LBC. While 11% of conventional preparations were reported as unsatisfactory and almost 9% were reported as suboptimal, evaluation of the same cases using LBC saw this combined figure reduced to 2.3%. AIM: To evaluate whether this dramatic fall in unsatisfactory smears has been maintained with the use of LBC. The database for all smears reported for 2005 (100% LBC) was interrogated. The number of unsatisfactory reports was calculated. The reason for an unsatisfactory report was recorded for each case. The overall unsatisfactory rate was compared with that reported in the 1999 split sample study. A total of 41,312 smear tests were reported in 2005. 1,342 (3.25%) were reported as unsatisfactory. Our findings support the ongoing value of LBC in a routine cervical screening laboratory in terms of continuing to maintain a low rate of unsatisfactory smears.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMass Screening
dc.subject.meshSpecimen Handling
dc.subject.meshVaginal Smears
dc.titleHas the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pathology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. anntreacy@mac.comen
dc.identifier.journalDiagnostic cytopathologyen
dc.description.provinceLeinster
html.description.abstractLiquid-based cytology (LBC) has replaced conventional smear assessment in many centers over recent years. In our laboratory this transfer took place in 1999. At that time we performed a split sample study comparing the conventional method of cervical smear evaluation with the ThinPrep system. This split sample study identified a dramatic improvement in specimen adequacy with LBC. While 11% of conventional preparations were reported as unsatisfactory and almost 9% were reported as suboptimal, evaluation of the same cases using LBC saw this combined figure reduced to 2.3%. AIM: To evaluate whether this dramatic fall in unsatisfactory smears has been maintained with the use of LBC. The database for all smears reported for 2005 (100% LBC) was interrogated. The number of unsatisfactory reports was calculated. The reason for an unsatisfactory report was recorded for each case. The overall unsatisfactory rate was compared with that reported in the 1999 split sample study. A total of 41,312 smear tests were reported in 2005. 1,342 (3.25%) were reported as unsatisfactory. Our findings support the ongoing value of LBC in a routine cervical screening laboratory in terms of continuing to maintain a low rate of unsatisfactory smears.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record