Comparison of the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins.
Maharaj, Chrisen H
Malik, Muhammad A
O' Donnell, John
Higgins, Brendan D
Harte, Brian H
Laffey, John G
AffiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland. email@example.com
MeSHAnalysis of Variance
MetadataShow full item record
CitationComparison of the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. 2009, 9:2 BMC Emerg Med
JournalBMC emergency medicine
AbstractParamedics are frequently required to perform tracheal intubation, a potentially life-saving manoeuvre in severely ill patients, in the prehospital setting. However, direct laryngoscopy is often more difficult in this environment, and failed tracheal intubation constitutes an important cause of morbidity. Novel indirect laryngoscopes, such as the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes may reduce this risk.
We compared the efficacy of these devices to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by 21 Paramedics proficient in direct laryngoscopy, in a randomized, controlled, manikin study. Following brief didactic instruction with the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes, each participant took turns performing laryngoscopy and intubation with each device, in an easy intubation scenario and following placement of a hard cervical collar, in a SimMan manikin.
The Airtraq reduced the number of optimization manoeuvres and reduced the potential for dental trauma when compared to the Macintosh, in both the normal and simulated difficult intubation scenarios. In contrast, the Truview increased the duration of intubation attempts, and required a greater number of optimization manoeuvres, compared to both the Macintosh and Airtraq devices.
The Airtraq laryngoscope performed more favourably than the Macintosh and Truview devices when used by Paramedics in this manikin study. Further studies are required to extend these findings to the clinical setting.
- Comparison of the Glidescope and Pentax AWS laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation.
- Authors: Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Malik MA, O' Donnell J, Higgins BD, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2009 May 17
- Tracheal intubation by inexperienced medical residents using the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes--a manikin study.
- Authors: Maharaj CH, Ni Chonghaile M, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2006 Nov
- Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope.
- Authors: Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2006 Jul
- A comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes and the ILMA in novice users: a manikin study.
- Authors: Maharaj CH, McDonnell JG, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2007 Nov
- Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.
- Authors: McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, Flynn NM, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2010 May