Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOoi, Poh Veh
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Noirin
dc.contributor.authorO'Donoghue, Keelin
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-11T13:59:03Z
dc.date.available2011-07-11T13:59:03Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.identifier.citationSecondary recurrent miscarriage is associated with previous male birth. 2011, 88 (1):38-41 J. Reprod. Immunol.en
dc.identifier.issn1872-7603
dc.identifier.pmid21129780
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jri.2010.10.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/135765
dc.description.abstractSecondary recurrent miscarriage (RM) is defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses after delivery of a viable infant. Previous reports suggest that a firstborn male child is associated with less favourable subsequent reproductive potential, possibly due to maternal immunisation against male-specific minor histocompatibility antigens. In a retrospective cohort study of 85 cases of secondary RM we aimed to determine if secondary RM was associated with (i) gender of previous child, maternal age, or duration of miscarriage history, and (ii) increased risk of pregnancy complications. Fifty-three women (62.0%; 53/85) gave birth to a male child prior to RM compared to 32 (38.0%; 32/85) who gave birth to a female child (p=0.002). The majority (91.7%; 78/85) had uncomplicated, term deliveries and normal birth weight neonates, with one quarter of the women previously delivered by Caesarean section. All had routine RM investigations and 19.0% (16/85) had an abnormal result. Fifty-seven women conceived again and 33.3% (19/57) miscarried, but there was no significant difference in failure rates between those with a previous male or female child (13/32 vs. 6/25, p=0.2). When patients with abnormal results were excluded, or when women with only one previous child were considered, there was still no difference in these rates. A previous male birth may be associated with an increased risk of secondary RM but numbers preclude concluding whether this increases recurrence risk. The suggested association with previous male birth provides a basis for further investigations at a molecular level.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAbortion, Habitual
dc.subject.meshCohort Studies
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHLA Antigens
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLive Birth
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshParturition
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Complications
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Outcome
dc.subject.meshReproductive History
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.subject.meshSex Factors
dc.titleSecondary recurrent miscarriage is associated with previous male birth.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentAnu Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.en
dc.identifier.journalJournal of reproductive immunologyen
dc.description.provinceMunster
html.description.abstractSecondary recurrent miscarriage (RM) is defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses after delivery of a viable infant. Previous reports suggest that a firstborn male child is associated with less favourable subsequent reproductive potential, possibly due to maternal immunisation against male-specific minor histocompatibility antigens. In a retrospective cohort study of 85 cases of secondary RM we aimed to determine if secondary RM was associated with (i) gender of previous child, maternal age, or duration of miscarriage history, and (ii) increased risk of pregnancy complications. Fifty-three women (62.0%; 53/85) gave birth to a male child prior to RM compared to 32 (38.0%; 32/85) who gave birth to a female child (p=0.002). The majority (91.7%; 78/85) had uncomplicated, term deliveries and normal birth weight neonates, with one quarter of the women previously delivered by Caesarean section. All had routine RM investigations and 19.0% (16/85) had an abnormal result. Fifty-seven women conceived again and 33.3% (19/57) miscarried, but there was no significant difference in failure rates between those with a previous male or female child (13/32 vs. 6/25, p=0.2). When patients with abnormal results were excluded, or when women with only one previous child were considered, there was still no difference in these rates. A previous male birth may be associated with an increased risk of secondary RM but numbers preclude concluding whether this increases recurrence risk. The suggested association with previous male birth provides a basis for further investigations at a molecular level.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record