A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery.
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
Check access options
Check access options
AffiliationAcademic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Coombe Women & Infants, University Hospital & Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland., email@example.com
Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology
Obstetric Labor Complications/*epidemiology
Obstetrical Forceps/*adverse effects
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/*adverse effects/methods
MetadataShow full item record
CitationEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 May;156(1):41-5. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
JournalEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors and maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with sequential use of instruments (vacuum and forceps) at operative vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study of 1360 nulliparous women delivered by a single instrument (vacuum or forceps) or by both instruments, within two university teaching hospitals in Scotland and England. Outcomes were compared for use of sequential instruments versus use of any single instrument. A sub-group analysis compared sequential instruments versus forceps alone. Outcomes of interest included anal sphincter tears, postpartum haemorrhage, urinary retention, urinary incontinence, prolonged hospital admission, neonatal trauma, low Apgar scores, abnormal cord bloods and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). RESULTS: Use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery was associated with fetal malpositions, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.8 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.3-2.6), and large neonatal head circumference (>37 cm) (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.6-9.7) but not with maternal obesity or grade of operator. Sequential use of instruments was associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity than single instrument use (anal sphincter tear 17.4% versus 8.4%, adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; umbilical artery pH <7.10, 13.8% versus 5.0%, adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.2). Sequential instrument use had greater morbidity than single instrument use with forceps alone (anal sphincter tear OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9; umbilical artery pH <7.10 OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7-5.5). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sequential instruments significantly increases maternal and neonatal morbidity. Obstetricians need training in the appropriate selection and use of instruments with the aim of completing delivery safely with one instrument.
- A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
- Authors: Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
- Authors: Vayssière C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, Feraud O, Simon-Toulza C, Sentilhes L, Meunier E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Riethmuller D, Baud O, Galley-Raulin F, Diemunsch P, Pierre F, Schaal JP, Fournié A, Oury JF, French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians
- Issue date: 2011 Nov
- The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
- Authors: Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C
- Issue date: 2001 Oct
- Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
- Authors: de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW
- Issue date: 2008 Jan
- Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
- Authors: Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A
- Issue date: 2006 Feb