Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCormack, Ruaidhri
dc.contributor.authorClifford, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Marian
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-14T15:48:27Z
dc.date.available2012-08-14T15:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.citationAttitudes of UK doctors towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a systematic literature review. 2012, 26 (1):23-33 Palliat Meden_GB
dc.identifier.issn1477-030X
dc.identifier.pmid22190615
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269216311397688
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/238538
dc.descriptionOBJECTIVES: To review studies over a 20-year period that assess the attitudes of UK doctors concerning active, voluntary euthanasia (AVE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), assess efforts to minimise bias in included studies, determine the effect of subgroup variables (e.g. age, gender) on doctors' attitudes, and make recommendations for future research. Data sources: Three electronic databases, four pertinent journals, reference lists of included studies. Review methods: Literature search of English articles between January 1990 and April 2010. Studies were excluded if they did not present independent data (e.g. commentaries) or if they related to doctors outside the UK, patients younger than 18 years old, terminal sedation, withdrawing or withholding treatment, or double-effect. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted. RESULTS: Following study selection and data extraction, 15 studies were included. UK doctors oppose the introduction of both AVE and PAS in the majority of studies. Degree of religiosity appeared as a statistically significant factor in influencing doctors' attitudes. The top three themes in the qualitative analysis were the provision of palliative care, adequate safeguards in the event of AVE or PAS being introduced, and a profession to facilitate AVE or PAS that does not include doctors. CONCLUSIONS: UK doctors appear to oppose the introduction of AVE and PAS, even when one considers the methodological limitations of included studies. Attempts to minimise bias in included studies varied. Further studies are necessary to establish if subgroup variables other than degree of religiosity influence attitudes, and to thoroughly explore the qualitative themes that appeared.en_GB
dc.description.abstractTo review studies over a 20-year period that assess the attitudes of UK doctors concerning active, voluntary euthanasia (AVE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), assess efforts to minimise bias in included studies, determine the effect of subgroup variables (e.g. age, gender) on doctors' attitudes, and make recommendations for future research. Data sources: Three electronic databases, four pertinent journals, reference lists of included studies. Review methods: Literature search of English articles between January 1990 and April 2010. Studies were excluded if they did not present independent data (e.g. commentaries) or if they related to doctors outside the UK, patients younger than 18 years old, terminal sedation, withdrawing or withholding treatment, or double-effect. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted.
dc.description.abstractFollowing study selection and data extraction, 15 studies were included. UK doctors oppose the introduction of both AVE and PAS in the majority of studies. Degree of religiosity appeared as a statistically significant factor in influencing doctors' attitudes. The top three themes in the qualitative analysis were the provision of palliative care, adequate safeguards in the event of AVE or PAS being introduced, and a profession to facilitate AVE or PAS that does not include doctors.
dc.description.abstractUK doctors appear to oppose the introduction of AVE and PAS, even when one considers the methodological limitations of included studies. Attempts to minimise bias in included studies varied. Further studies are necessary to establish if subgroup variables other than degree of religiosity influence attitudes, and to thoroughly explore the qualitative themes that appeared.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Palliative medicineen_GB
dc.subjectDEATHen_GB
dc.subjectEUTHANASIAen_GB
dc.subject.meshAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject.meshEuthanasia
dc.subject.meshGreat Britain
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPhysician's Role
dc.subject.meshPhysicians
dc.subject.meshReligion
dc.subject.meshRight to Die
dc.subject.meshSuicide, Assisted
dc.titleAttitudes of UK doctors towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a systematic literature review.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Milford Care Centre, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland. r.mccormack@kcl.ac.uken_GB
dc.identifier.journalPalliative medicineen_GB
html.description.abstractTo review studies over a 20-year period that assess the attitudes of UK doctors concerning active, voluntary euthanasia (AVE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), assess efforts to minimise bias in included studies, determine the effect of subgroup variables (e.g. age, gender) on doctors' attitudes, and make recommendations for future research. Data sources: Three electronic databases, four pertinent journals, reference lists of included studies. Review methods: Literature search of English articles between January 1990 and April 2010. Studies were excluded if they did not present independent data (e.g. commentaries) or if they related to doctors outside the UK, patients younger than 18 years old, terminal sedation, withdrawing or withholding treatment, or double-effect. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted.
html.description.abstractFollowing study selection and data extraction, 15 studies were included. UK doctors oppose the introduction of both AVE and PAS in the majority of studies. Degree of religiosity appeared as a statistically significant factor in influencing doctors' attitudes. The top three themes in the qualitative analysis were the provision of palliative care, adequate safeguards in the event of AVE or PAS being introduced, and a profession to facilitate AVE or PAS that does not include doctors.
html.description.abstractUK doctors appear to oppose the introduction of AVE and PAS, even when one considers the methodological limitations of included studies. Attempts to minimise bias in included studies varied. Further studies are necessary to establish if subgroup variables other than degree of religiosity influence attitudes, and to thoroughly explore the qualitative themes that appeared.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record