Cardiac Risk Assessment, Morbidity Prediction, and Outcome in the Vascular Intensive Care Unit.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationCardiac Risk Assessment, Morbidity Prediction, and Outcome in the Vascular Intensive Care Unit. 2013: Vasc Endovascular Surg
PublisherVascular and endovascular surgery
JournalVascular and endovascular surgery
AbstractObjectives: The aim of this study is to examine the predictive value of the Lee revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) for a standard vascular intensive care unit (ICU) population as well as assessing the utility of transthoracic echocardiography and the impact of prior coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary revascularization on patient outcome. Design: This is a retrospective review of prospectively maintained Vascubase and prospectively collected ICU data. Materials and Methods: Data from 363 consecutive vascular ICU admissions were collected. Findings were used to calculate the RCRI, which was then correlated with patient outcomes. All patients were on optimal medical therapy (OMT) in the form of cardioselective β-blocker, aspirin, statin, and folic acid. Results: There was no relationship found between a reduced ejection fraction and patient outcome. Mortality was significantly increased for patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) as identified on echo (14.9% vs 6.5%, P = .028). The overall complication rates were significantly elevated for patients with valvular dysfunction. Discrimination for the RCRI on receiver-operating characteristic analysis was poor, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of .621. Model calibration was reasonable with an Hosmer-Lemeshow Ĉ statistic of 2.726 (P = .256). Of those with known CAD, 41.22% of the patients receiving best medical treatment developed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to 35.3% of those who previously underwent percutaneous cardiac intervention and 23.5% of those who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. There was 3-fold increase in major adverse clinical events in patients with troponin rise and LVH. Conclusions: The RCRI's discriminatory capacity is low, and this raises difficulties in assessing cardiac risk in patients undergoing vascular intervention. The AMI is highest in the OMT group without prior cardiac intervention, which mandates protocols to identify patients requiring cardiac intervention prior to vascular procedures.
- Complexity of coronary artery disease affects outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function.
- Authors: Melina G, Angeloni E, Benedetto U, Monti F, Roscitano A, Serdoz R, Sinatra R
- Issue date: 2013 Sep
- The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.
- Authors: Bertges DJ, Goodney PP, Zhao Y, Schanzer A, Nolan BW, Likosky DS, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Cronenwett JL, Vascular Study Group of New England.
- Issue date: 2010 Sep
- Does EuroSCORE predict length of stay and specific postoperative complications after cardiac surgery?
- Authors: Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Swistel DG, DeRose JJ Jr
- Issue date: 2005 Jan
- A preoperative and intraoperative predictive model of prolonged intensive care unit stay for valvular surgery.
- Authors: Xu J, Ge Y, Pan S, Liu F, Shi Y
- Issue date: 2006 Mar
- The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.
- Authors: Keegan MT, Harrison BA, Brown DR, Whalen FX, Cassivi SD, Afessa B
- Issue date: 2007 Dec