Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Carla
dc.contributor.authorKlimas, Jan
dc.contributor.authorDunne, Colum
dc.contributor.authorLeddin, Des
dc.contributor.authorMeagher, David
dc.contributor.authorO'Toole, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorCullen, Walter
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-04T15:33:09Z
dc.date.available2014-04-04T15:33:09Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-31
dc.identifier.citationKey performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature review and discussion paper 2014:1 Mental Health and Substance Useen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1752-3281
dc.identifier.issn1752-3273
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17523281.2014.901402
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/315394
dc.descriptionWith increasing recognition of the importance of mental and substance use disorders for population health and health systems and the potential value of systems-based performance indicators in addressing this issue, we aimed to describe the development and content of key performance indicators for mental and substance use disorders. Publications were identified through official websites, Google searches and PubMed. Following ‘PRISMA’ guidelines, twenty-five studies were kept for qualitative synthesis and six for quantitative analysis. We describe their use in practice by comparing their application across a range of public and mixed healthcare systems. Currently, key performance indicator development for mental and substance use disorders adopts several methodologies, including expert opinion, literature review, stakeholder consultation and the structured consensus method. The rationales provided for selection of particular key performance indicators vary greatly between systems. Systems exhibit different levels of key performance indicator adaptability, which is reflective of dynamic changes in evidence-based practices. We noted bias in the level of key performance indicator assessment towards system/health plan evaluation followed by programme/service evaluation. Similarly, there is a large skew towards key performance indicators that reflect evaluation of processes. Collection of data in all systems is nearly exclusively reliant on electronic administrative/medical data. Experiences from these systems are synthesized into methodological recommendations, and considerations for further research and clinical practice are provided.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipHRB, UL-GEMSen_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publishertaylor and francisen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17523281.2014.901402en_GB
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Mental Health and Substance Useen_GB
dc.subjectPRIMARY CAREen_GB
dc.subjectMENTAL HEALTHen_GB
dc.subjectSUBSTANCE MISUSEen_GB
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTen_GB
dc.subject.otherSUBSTANCE USE DISORDERSen_GB
dc.titleKey performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature review and discussion paperen_GB
dc.typeArticle In Pressen
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limericken_GB
dc.identifier.journalMental Health and Substance Useen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-23T23:52:26Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
revision-126166973416755481PDF ...
Size:
572.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
accepted version main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record