A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate three immobilisation devices for intra-thoracic radiation therapy
MetadataShow full item record
CitationA prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate three immobilisation devices for intra-thoracic radiation therapy 2010, 9 (02):65 Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
JournalJournal of Radiotherapy in Practice
AbstractPurpose: To determine the optimal of three immobilisation devices for lung radiotherapy in terms of set-up reproducibility, patient comfort, radiation therapists’ (RTs) satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. Materials and methods: A total of 30 lung CRT patients were randomised to one of three immobilisation techniques – Arm A, headsponge; Arm B, BreastBoard dedicated immobilisation device; and Arm C, LungBoard dedicated immobilisation device. Results: Random errors were larger for Arm A versus C in all directions ( p < 0.05). Random errors were larger for Arm A versus B for y and z directions ( p < 0.05). When the data for the immobilisation devices (Arms B+C) were pooled and compared with Arm A (no dedicated device), the systematic errors were larger in the z direction for A ( p < 0.05). Arm C was cheaper and was more comfortable for patients. Therapists preferred this device (Arm C) and treatment times were less ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: This is the first prospective randomised controlled lung immobilisation trial, based on 3-DCRT, that takes into account treatment accuracy, users satisfaction and resource implications. It suggests that the LungBoard immobilisation device is optimal.