Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaoire, Áine Ní
dc.contributor.authorMurtagh, Fliss E M
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T16:54:24Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T16:54:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-23
dc.identifier.citationSystematic review of pharmacological therapies for the management of ischaemic pain in patients with non-reconstructable critical limb ischaemia. 2017 BMJ Support Palliat Careen
dc.identifier.issn2045-4368
dc.identifier.pmid28835456
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/622770
dc.descriptionSystematic review of pharmacological therapies for the management of ischaemic pain in patients with non-reconstructable critical limb ischaemia. Laoire ÁN1, Murtagh FEM2. Author information 1Milford Care Centre, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.2Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK. Abstract BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is a severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, characterised by chronic ischaemic rest pain, ulcers or gangrene. Management of ischaemic pain is challenging in patients with no options for revascularisation and optimal pharmacological therapies have not been established. OBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies to treat ischaemic pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI. METHODS: This systematic review was reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases, a PubMed-related articles link search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were performed. Studies recruiting adult patients with CLI of any aetiology were eligible for inclusion. Surgical and revascularisation procedures, and all invasive interventions were excluded. RESULTS: Of 792 studies, six met full inclusion criteria. These studies researched the use of intravenous lidocaine, intravenous ketamine, oral gabapentin and the combination of transdermal buprenorphine and epidural morphine/ropivacaine infusion. All studies showed an improvement in severity of ischaemic pain in CLI but with varying side effect profiles and quality. The extracted studies showed substantial heterogeneity and therefore a meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: The pharmacological management of pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI is a challenging review topic. No recommendations of pharmacological agents can be made following this review but a number of novel approaches to manage pain in this cohort have shown positive results and require further investigation.en
dc.description.abstractCritical limb ischaemia (CLI) is a severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, characterised by chronic ischaemic rest pain, ulcers or gangrene. Management of ischaemic pain is challenging in patients with no options for revascularisation and optimal pharmacological therapies have not been established.
dc.description.abstractTo identify and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies to treat ischaemic pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI.
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review was reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases, a PubMed-related articles link search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were performed. Studies recruiting adult patients with CLI of any aetiology were eligible for inclusion. Surgical and revascularisation procedures, and all invasive interventions were excluded.
dc.description.abstractOf 792 studies, six met full inclusion criteria. These studies researched the use of intravenous lidocaine, intravenous ketamine, oral gabapentin and the combination of transdermal buprenorphine and epidural morphine/ropivacaine infusion. All studies showed an improvement in severity of ischaemic pain in CLI but with varying side effect profiles and quality. The extracted studies showed substantial heterogeneity and therefore a meta-analysis was not performed.
dc.description.abstractThe pharmacological management of pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI is a challenging review topic. No recommendations of pharmacological agents can be made following this review but a number of novel approaches to manage pain in this cohort have shown positive results and require further investigation.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2017/08/23/bmjspcare-2017-001359.longen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to BMJ supportive & palliative careen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCHRONIC DISEASEen
dc.subjectPAINen
dc.subjectSymptom managementen
dc.subjectperipheral vascular diseaseen
dc.titleSystematic review of pharmacological therapies for the management of ischaemic pain in patients with non-reconstructable critical limb ischaemia.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentMilford Care Centre, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland; Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalBMJ supportive & palliative careen
html.description.abstractCritical limb ischaemia (CLI) is a severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, characterised by chronic ischaemic rest pain, ulcers or gangrene. Management of ischaemic pain is challenging in patients with no options for revascularisation and optimal pharmacological therapies have not been established.
html.description.abstractTo identify and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies to treat ischaemic pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI.
html.description.abstractThis systematic review was reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases, a PubMed-related articles link search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were performed. Studies recruiting adult patients with CLI of any aetiology were eligible for inclusion. Surgical and revascularisation procedures, and all invasive interventions were excluded.
html.description.abstractOf 792 studies, six met full inclusion criteria. These studies researched the use of intravenous lidocaine, intravenous ketamine, oral gabapentin and the combination of transdermal buprenorphine and epidural morphine/ropivacaine infusion. All studies showed an improvement in severity of ischaemic pain in CLI but with varying side effect profiles and quality. The extracted studies showed substantial heterogeneity and therefore a meta-analysis was not performed.
html.description.abstractThe pharmacological management of pain secondary to non-reconstructable CLI is a challenging review topic. No recommendations of pharmacological agents can be made following this review but a number of novel approaches to manage pain in this cohort have shown positive results and require further investigation.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Archived with thanks to BMJ supportive & palliative care
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Archived with thanks to BMJ supportive & palliative care